Difference Between AGV and AMR – Yamaha Robot

Two automation systems are the customer's first choice for goods/pallet movements: Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) and Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs). AGVs have been around for a long time, and over time, their capabilities and skills have improved dramatically, and AMRs are gaining traction.

However, for companies that not only want automation, but also want to improve productivity by training operators from the ground up to accomplish more value-added missions, good load handling and adaptability are essential. Therefore, AGVs are an attractive proposition.

Difference Between AGV and AMR – Yamaha Robot

Difference Between AGV and AMR – Yamaha Robot

But how are they different from AMRs?

Load handling capacity

AGVs and AMRs differ in terms of the load handling capacity and type of their deployment. AGVs can be used for pallet loads in horizontal and vertical applications, while AMRs can only be used for floor movement.

While AMRs are sensitive and changeable, they are not completely efficient if you need to store/retrieve pallets from overhead shelves. Another factor to consider is the maximum weight of the load, AMR is generally useful and feasible for loads of less than 200kg. When it comes to moving loads beyond 200 kg, AGVs are the best choice because they are able to safely handle loads of up to 2000 kg.

Dual mode

Another key difference between AGVs and AMRs is controllability. Today's AGV suppliers are able to offer you dual-mode selection. This will be able to take over the robot at any time and be able to manually drive it when needed, and then switch it back to autonomous mode. AMRs can be controlled according to their movements, but they will insist on autonomy or "follow human" choices. Therefore, it is advisable to keep this sensitivity in mind when defining projects.

Infrastructure requirements

Many AMR needs are driven by the reality that they require zero devices or prerequisites. With advanced navigation skills, their missions are easier to configure and generally follow the path of ease.

Now, modern robotics providers are also able to extend this skill to AGVs, which use advanced navigation systems (e.g., SLAM) that locate existing maps created in the system in real time. This eliminates the need for any infrastructure needs and is able to match the simplicity of an AMR unit.

While the need defines a specific path for pick/place operations, today's AGVs are able to calculate the best possible path to improve power and throughput.

Sensitivity

The key point to consider is the sensitivity of both systems. On the ground, both AGVs and AMRs provide sensitivity when defining operations.

However, AMRs generally work best when they have large SKUs. Because AMR's primary function is to cut travel time and allow operators to focus on other missions, it relies on a higher number of SKUs to accomplish significant roles.

Conclusion

AGV is more traditional, driven by it has many years of development experience. AMRs are faster to set up and are better suited for lighter loads. AGVs are solid and able to accommodate higher and larger load movements. Both solutions are different, but they share a common approach: automating the warehouse process. Therefore, when defining a project, care should be taken to choose the right solution for you.

Difference Between AGV and AMR – Yamaha Robot

Sections viewed

Contact

working hours